<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 470 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109997</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Trial Judge&#039;s decision to admit the winding up petition against the company due to its failure to fulfill obligations under a Memorandum of Understanding, resulting in a disputed debt. The company&#039;s lack of tangible assets and minimal profits supported the decision for winding up. The Court directed the company to provide a bank guarantee or security to contest the claim, emphasizing the creditor&#039;s interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 470 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109997</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Trial Judge&#039;s decision to admit the winding up petition against the company due to its failure to fulfill obligations under a Memorandum of Understanding, resulting in a disputed debt. The company&#039;s lack of tangible assets and minimal profits supported the decision for winding up. The Court directed the company to provide a bank guarantee or security to contest the claim, emphasizing the creditor&#039;s interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>