https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109996 The Bench rejected the application to recall the Final Order in the appeal, as it was deemed fit for instant disposal despite the absence of representation by the appellants during the hearing. The Bench clarified that the cited cases related to dismissals for default or non-prosecution, which differed from the present situation where the appeal was disposed of on its merits. The application, filed solely by the Advocate without an accompanying affidavit from the party, was rejected, and the Final Order was upheld. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:11:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109996 The Bench rejected the application to recall the Final Order in the appeal, as it was deemed fit for instant disposal despite the absence of representation by the appellants during the hearing. The Bench clarified that the cited cases related to dismissals for default or non-prosecution, which differed from the present situation where the appeal was disposed of on its merits. The application, filed solely by the Advocate without an accompanying affidavit from the party, was rejected, and the Final Order was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109996