<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 583 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109992</link>
    <description>Where duty liability arises after a change in the departmental view on excisability, limitation and exemption entitlement must be examined independently on the material on record. The demand could not be confirmed without a finding on limitation, especially where the goods had been cleared under an approved classification list, and the longer period had to be justified afresh. The small scale exemption claim also required reconsideration in de novo proceedings, rather than rejection solely on allegations of clandestine removal or misstatement. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision on limitation and exemption, with the classification issue kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:01:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 583 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109992</link>
      <description>Where duty liability arises after a change in the departmental view on excisability, limitation and exemption entitlement must be examined independently on the material on record. The demand could not be confirmed without a finding on limitation, especially where the goods had been cleared under an approved classification list, and the longer period had to be justified afresh. The small scale exemption claim also required reconsideration in de novo proceedings, rather than rejection solely on allegations of clandestine removal or misstatement. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision on limitation and exemption, with the classification issue kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>