<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 434 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109988</link>
    <description>Finalised annual capacity determination under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act and Rule 96ZQ bound the assessee once its challenge failed as time-barred, so duty could be recovered for the earlier period on the basis of the amended show cause notices. The assessee could not rely on decisions in other matters to override the final order in its own case. The duty demand for the relevant past period was upheld. Penalty was treated separately from duty liability, and the equal penalty was found excessive on the facts; it was reduced to one lakh rupees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 434 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109988</link>
      <description>Finalised annual capacity determination under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act and Rule 96ZQ bound the assessee once its challenge failed as time-barred, so duty could be recovered for the earlier period on the basis of the amended show cause notices. The assessee could not rely on decisions in other matters to override the final order in its own case. The duty demand for the relevant past period was upheld. Penalty was treated separately from duty liability, and the equal penalty was found excessive on the facts; it was reduced to one lakh rupees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>