<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 616 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109971</link>
    <description>Exemption under a conditional notification must be confined to the categories expressly named in the notification, and a sole proprietary concern outside those categories cannot claim the benefit. The Tribunal applied earlier precedent and held that the concern was not an eligible institution for exemption under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. The claim for relief therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 616 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109971</link>
      <description>Exemption under a conditional notification must be confined to the categories expressly named in the notification, and a sole proprietary concern outside those categories cannot claim the benefit. The Tribunal applied earlier precedent and held that the concern was not an eligible institution for exemption under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. The claim for relief therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>