<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 459 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109968</link>
    <description>A short-lived interlocutory status quo arrangement pending completion of pleadings will not ordinarily be disturbed in appeal unless a clear legal or jurisdictional error and actual prejudice are shown. A transitory direction to maintain status quo over property and shares was treated as innocuous where the relevant allotment and transfer steps had already been completed and no imminent alienation was demonstrated. A factual observation about a proposed management arrangement was not treated as an injunction. The appellate forum declined to pre-judge the pending company petition and left the interim application to be decided by the statutory tribunal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 459 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109968</link>
      <description>A short-lived interlocutory status quo arrangement pending completion of pleadings will not ordinarily be disturbed in appeal unless a clear legal or jurisdictional error and actual prejudice are shown. A transitory direction to maintain status quo over property and shares was treated as innocuous where the relevant allotment and transfer steps had already been completed and no imminent alienation was demonstrated. A factual observation about a proposed management arrangement was not treated as an injunction. The appellate forum declined to pre-judge the pending company petition and left the interim application to be decided by the statutory tribunal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>