<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 529 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109961</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, a foreign company, in a dispute with an Indian company over non-payment of a debt for goods supplied. The court upheld the validity of the statutory notice issued under the Companies Act, 1956, before an assignment deed, and ruled that re-endorsement of a bill of exchange was not necessary for the petition to be maintained. The respondent was ordered to deposit the outstanding amount within eight weeks, with further instructions depending on compliance. The petition was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 529 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109961</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, a foreign company, in a dispute with an Indian company over non-payment of a debt for goods supplied. The court upheld the validity of the statutory notice issued under the Companies Act, 1956, before an assignment deed, and ruled that re-endorsement of a bill of exchange was not necessary for the petition to be maintained. The respondent was ordered to deposit the outstanding amount within eight weeks, with further instructions depending on compliance. The petition was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>