https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109959 Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not require separate consents for institution of a recovery suit and for execution of the resulting decree. The provision permits a competent forum to grant composite permission covering both stages, as it prescribes no specific form for consent. On the facts discussed, the Board's earlier clarification that its permission extended to execution was accepted and left undisturbed, so the objection to execution on the ground of fresh consent was not sustainable. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:04:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109959 Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not require separate consents for institution of a recovery suit and for execution of the resulting decree. The provision permits a competent forum to grant composite permission covering both stages, as it prescribes no specific form for consent. On the facts discussed, the Board's earlier clarification that its permission extended to execution was accepted and left undisturbed, so the objection to execution on the ground of fresh consent was not sustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109959