<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 628 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109941</link>
    <description>Annual capacity fixation under the compounded levy scheme was treated as final where furnace parameters were verified by departmental officers, re-verified with a technical expert in the appellant&#039;s presence, and the verification reports were signed and accepted. The appellant had also sought re-measurement, which was granted. On these facts, a later challenge based on alleged discrepancies in the measurements was not sustainable, and the capacity determination was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:06:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 628 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109941</link>
      <description>Annual capacity fixation under the compounded levy scheme was treated as final where furnace parameters were verified by departmental officers, re-verified with a technical expert in the appellant&#039;s presence, and the verification reports were signed and accepted. The appellant had also sought re-measurement, which was granted. On these facts, a later challenge based on alleged discrepancies in the measurements was not sustainable, and the capacity determination was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>