<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 416 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109919</link>
    <description>The notification for annual capacity of production under the stenter rules measures capacity by the number and size of chambers, and Explanation I deems a float drying machine or similar specified equipment attached to a stenter as one chamber. A fabric-movement arrangement installed inside the stenter, which only aided movement of fabric below the chain, did not fall within that deeming language and could not be treated as chamber-multiplying equipment. The additional drying effect was already captured within the prescribed capacity mechanism, so the chamber count could not be increased on that basis and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:50:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 416 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109919</link>
      <description>The notification for annual capacity of production under the stenter rules measures capacity by the number and size of chambers, and Explanation I deems a float drying machine or similar specified equipment attached to a stenter as one chamber. A fabric-movement arrangement installed inside the stenter, which only aided movement of fabric below the chain, did not fall within that deeming language and could not be treated as chamber-multiplying equipment. The additional drying effect was already captured within the prescribed capacity mechanism, so the chamber count could not be increased on that basis and the demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>