<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 595 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109906</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for duty demand on valuation of parts cleared to the assessee&#039;s own factory because separate price lists had disclosed the relevant clearances and no deliberate suppression or intent to evade duty was shown. The demand was therefore confined to the normal period, although it remained otherwise sustainable on merits. Penalty under the Modvat provision was also not sustainable where credit had been validly taken on receipt of inputs and their later obsolescence or non-use did not establish fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression, or other intent to evade duty. The penalty was set aside on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 595 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109906</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for duty demand on valuation of parts cleared to the assessee&#039;s own factory because separate price lists had disclosed the relevant clearances and no deliberate suppression or intent to evade duty was shown. The demand was therefore confined to the normal period, although it remained otherwise sustainable on merits. Penalty under the Modvat provision was also not sustainable where credit had been validly taken on receipt of inputs and their later obsolescence or non-use did not establish fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression, or other intent to evade duty. The penalty was set aside on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>