<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 592 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109903</link>
    <description>The appeals seeking condonation of delay in filing were dismissed by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, as the consultant filed the applications on behalf of the appellants without proper authorization. The appeals were deemed time-barred and dismissed, along with the stay applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 592 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109903</link>
      <description>The appeals seeking condonation of delay in filing were dismissed by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, as the consultant filed the applications on behalf of the appellants without proper authorization. The appeals were deemed time-barred and dismissed, along with the stay applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>