<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding duty and penalties on the appellant for manufacturing synthetic diamond polishing powder. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s processes, including treating imported uncoated powder with chemicals and grading it for different applications, did not clearly constitute manufacturing due to discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s declarations. The Tribunal concluded that the processes were more akin to impurity removal and enhancing powder utilization for cutting diamonds, thus rejecting the invocation of the extended limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding duty and penalties on the appellant for manufacturing synthetic diamond polishing powder. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s processes, including treating imported uncoated powder with chemicals and grading it for different applications, did not clearly constitute manufacturing due to discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s declarations. The Tribunal concluded that the processes were more akin to impurity removal and enhancing powder utilization for cutting diamonds, thus rejecting the invocation of the extended limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>