<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 399 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109873</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeals against the confiscation of vessels MSV Bahare Tasnim and MSV Al-Shama under Section 115 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no evidence proving the vessels were used for smuggling with the owner&#039;s or agent&#039;s knowledge, similar to a prior case. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders for vessel confiscation, emphasizing the lack of proof implicating the owner or agent in the smuggling activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 399 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109873</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeals against the confiscation of vessels MSV Bahare Tasnim and MSV Al-Shama under Section 115 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no evidence proving the vessels were used for smuggling with the owner&#039;s or agent&#039;s knowledge, similar to a prior case. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders for vessel confiscation, emphasizing the lack of proof implicating the owner or agent in the smuggling activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>