<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 456 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109870</link>
    <description>The appeal against the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order confirming a Customs duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalties on the appellants was dismissed. The appellants, failing to meet export obligations, lost their duty-free import approval. The challenge of natural justice violation was rejected as the appellants did not respond to notices. The Customs duty demand stood, but excessive fines and penalties were reduced. Compliance with export obligations is crucial for maintaining benefits under export schemes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 456 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109870</link>
      <description>The appeal against the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order confirming a Customs duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalties on the appellants was dismissed. The appellants, failing to meet export obligations, lost their duty-free import approval. The challenge of natural justice violation was rejected as the appellants did not respond to notices. The Customs duty demand stood, but excessive fines and penalties were reduced. Compliance with export obligations is crucial for maintaining benefits under export schemes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>