<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 440 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109854</link>
    <description>Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement could not be entertained merely on an offer to deposit part of the amount; compliance with the statutory condition had to come first. Time was, however, granted to meet the pre-deposit requirement, and only after such compliance would the restoration application be considered and the appeal heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:33:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 440 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109854</link>
      <description>Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement could not be entertained merely on an offer to deposit part of the amount; compliance with the statutory condition had to come first. Time was, however, granted to meet the pre-deposit requirement, and only after such compliance would the restoration application be considered and the appeal heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>