<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 432 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109846</link>
    <description>A prima facie finding recorded in a stay order cannot replace a final adjudication on the merits of a classification dispute, and an appellate authority must independently examine the controversy before disposing of the appeal. An order that relies only on an unchallenged stay order, without addressing the merits, is a non-speaking order. The dismissal on that basis was unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 432 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109846</link>
      <description>A prima facie finding recorded in a stay order cannot replace a final adjudication on the merits of a classification dispute, and an appellate authority must independently examine the controversy before disposing of the appeal. An order that relies only on an unchallenged stay order, without addressing the merits, is a non-speaking order. The dismissal on that basis was unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>