<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 431 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appeal challenging the Order-in-Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) to be maintainable. It held that directing the appeal to an officer other than the one who passed the original order violated Section 129D of the Customs Act. Emphasizing the need for compliance with legal provisions, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, citing the importance of directing appeals to the appropriate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 431 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appeal challenging the Order-in-Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) to be maintainable. It held that directing the appeal to an officer other than the one who passed the original order violated Section 129D of the Customs Act. Emphasizing the need for compliance with legal provisions, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, citing the importance of directing appeals to the appropriate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>