<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 620 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109818</link>
    <description>Rule 57Q credit on refrigeration compressor and allied equipment had to be reconsidered because the amended definition of capital goods effective from 16-3-1995 was not properly addressed. The governing test, as explained in Jawahar Mills, treated use in the factory as the relevant criterion rather than a direct nexus with manufacture. As the Commissioner (Appeals) had not clearly examined the amendment while allowing credit, a de novo review was required. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:15:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 620 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109818</link>
      <description>Rule 57Q credit on refrigeration compressor and allied equipment had to be reconsidered because the amended definition of capital goods effective from 16-3-1995 was not properly addressed. The governing test, as explained in Jawahar Mills, treated use in the factory as the relevant criterion rather than a direct nexus with manufacture. As the Commissioner (Appeals) had not clearly examined the amendment while allowing credit, a de novo review was required. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>