<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 615 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109813</link>
    <description>Unmarketable goods still awaiting ISI testing and not yet at the finished stage could not be confiscated merely because they were unrecorded in stock, but finished PVC compound loaded in a tempo at the factory gate was treated as goods taken for marketing and its non-accountal supported confiscation. A duty demand based on shortages of inputs failed because there was no evidence of clandestine manufacture or removal, and the assessee&#039;s explanation that the inputs were used in excess in-factory production was not rebutted. Penalty was therefore scaled down in line with the limited surviving lapse and reduced to Rs. 5,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:46:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 615 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109813</link>
      <description>Unmarketable goods still awaiting ISI testing and not yet at the finished stage could not be confiscated merely because they were unrecorded in stock, but finished PVC compound loaded in a tempo at the factory gate was treated as goods taken for marketing and its non-accountal supported confiscation. A duty demand based on shortages of inputs failed because there was no evidence of clandestine manufacture or removal, and the assessee&#039;s explanation that the inputs were used in excess in-factory production was not rebutted. Penalty was therefore scaled down in line with the limited surviving lapse and reduced to Rs. 5,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>