https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109806 The Tribunal denied the Modvat credit of Rs. 66,595 due to invoices lacking the necessary "duplicate for transporter" marking. The Department sought rectification of the Final Order, pointing out this error. Evidence showed suppliers had marked the invoices post-credit availing. Despite the Tribunal's initial decision in favor of the assessee, the lower appellate authority upheld the denial based on the missing marking. The Final Order amendment rejected the appeal, emphasizing adherence to invoice marking requirements for credit eligibility. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:08:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109806 The Tribunal denied the Modvat credit of Rs. 66,595 due to invoices lacking the necessary "duplicate for transporter" marking. The Department sought rectification of the Final Order, pointing out this error. Evidence showed suppliers had marked the invoices post-credit availing. Despite the Tribunal's initial decision in favor of the assessee, the lower appellate authority upheld the denial based on the missing marking. The Final Order amendment rejected the appeal, emphasizing adherence to invoice marking requirements for credit eligibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109806