<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 408 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to extend benefits under Notification No. 32/99-C.E. to the respondents based on a 25.65% increase in installed capacity of their unit, supported by certifications and audit confirmation. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument on the weaving section&#039;s lack of expansion, the Tribunal ruled that an overall 25% increase in the manufacturing unit met notification conditions. As the Revenue did not dispute this increase, the Tribunal dismissed their appeal, allowing the respondents to claim the notification benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:01:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 408 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to extend benefits under Notification No. 32/99-C.E. to the respondents based on a 25.65% increase in installed capacity of their unit, supported by certifications and audit confirmation. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument on the weaving section&#039;s lack of expansion, the Tribunal ruled that an overall 25% increase in the manufacturing unit met notification conditions. As the Revenue did not dispute this increase, the Tribunal dismissed their appeal, allowing the respondents to claim the notification benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>