<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 405 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109801</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the appeal concerning the benefit of Notification No. 154/86-Cus. The appellants&#039; imported machine did not meet the specified criteria, leading to denial of the concessional rate of duty. The Tribunal upheld the decision, ruling that the machine did not qualify for the benefit outlined in the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 405 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109801</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the appeal concerning the benefit of Notification No. 154/86-Cus. The appellants&#039; imported machine did not meet the specified criteria, leading to denial of the concessional rate of duty. The Tribunal upheld the decision, ruling that the machine did not qualify for the benefit outlined in the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>