https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109800 The Tribunal upheld the classification of Vicco products as Ayurvedic medicines under CET sub-heading 3003.31. It found that the Deputy Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to reclassify the products and distinguished the Baidyanath case, emphasizing the inert nature of additional ingredients. The Tribunal rejected the common parlance test, affirming the products' classification as Ayurvedic medicaments. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld, confirming the products' status as Ayurvedic medicines and disposing of the cross-objection accordingly. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:47:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109800 The Tribunal upheld the classification of Vicco products as Ayurvedic medicines under CET sub-heading 3003.31. It found that the Deputy Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to reclassify the products and distinguished the Baidyanath case, emphasizing the inert nature of additional ingredients. The Tribunal rejected the common parlance test, affirming the products' classification as Ayurvedic medicaments. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld, confirming the products' status as Ayurvedic medicines and disposing of the cross-objection accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109800