<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 624 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109797</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by the appellants regarding Modvat credit on inputs consumed before opting out of the scheme. The tribunal disagreed with the Revenue&#039;s view and held that the Modvat credit used by the appellants should not be deemed to have been lying in their stock. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 624 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109797</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal by the appellants regarding Modvat credit on inputs consumed before opting out of the scheme. The tribunal disagreed with the Revenue&#039;s view and held that the Modvat credit used by the appellants should not be deemed to have been lying in their stock. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>