https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109790 A government contract could not be terminated arbitrarily, and a termination simplicitor had to rest on good, fair and disclosed reasons even if not set out in detail. The court found that the grounds relied on for termination existed when the contract was made and when it was later continued after compromise, and no new supervening circumstance justified the abrupt exit. The objection under the Specific Relief Act was rejected because the relief was treated as protective relief under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, not enforcement of specific performance of a determinable contract. Interim injunction was granted, restraining removal or defacement of the bus advertisements. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:22:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109790 A government contract could not be terminated arbitrarily, and a termination simplicitor had to rest on good, fair and disclosed reasons even if not set out in detail. The court found that the grounds relied on for termination existed when the contract was made and when it was later continued after compromise, and no new supervening circumstance justified the abrupt exit. The objection under the Specific Relief Act was rejected because the relief was treated as protective relief under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, not enforcement of specific performance of a determinable contract. Interim injunction was granted, restraining removal or defacement of the bus advertisements. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109790