<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 614 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109780</link>
    <description>Woven plastic shade nets imported for greenhouse use were treated as covered by the notification entry for &quot;ultra violet retardant fibre glass/plastic sheets&quot; because &quot;sheet&quot; was not specially defined and had to be read in common parlance and ordinary dictionary sense. The majority accepted that a woven fabric or net could still answer that description, particularly where the goods were certified for greenhouse application, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s narrower distinction based on air permeability. The dissent considered the entry confined to plastic sheets and not to woven shade nets under a different tariff heading. The goods were held eligible for the notification benefit, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 614 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109780</link>
      <description>Woven plastic shade nets imported for greenhouse use were treated as covered by the notification entry for &quot;ultra violet retardant fibre glass/plastic sheets&quot; because &quot;sheet&quot; was not specially defined and had to be read in common parlance and ordinary dictionary sense. The majority accepted that a woven fabric or net could still answer that description, particularly where the goods were certified for greenhouse application, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s narrower distinction based on air permeability. The dissent considered the entry confined to plastic sheets and not to woven shade nets under a different tariff heading. The goods were held eligible for the notification benefit, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>