<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 611 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109772</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the Plaintiff, a partnership firm, in a case involving trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright infringement. The Defendants&#039; use of the deceptively similar trademark &quot;V.L.P.&quot; was deemed to infringe upon the Plaintiff&#039;s registered trademark &quot;V.I.P.&quot; The Court issued perpetual injunctions against the Defendants, restraining them from using any similar trademarks and copying the Plaintiff&#039;s artistic carton design. Additionally, a decree for rendition of accounts was granted to determine the profits earned by the Defendants, with the Plaintiff entitled to costs and detailed compliance directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 611 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109772</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the Plaintiff, a partnership firm, in a case involving trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright infringement. The Defendants&#039; use of the deceptively similar trademark &quot;V.L.P.&quot; was deemed to infringe upon the Plaintiff&#039;s registered trademark &quot;V.I.P.&quot; The Court issued perpetual injunctions against the Defendants, restraining them from using any similar trademarks and copying the Plaintiff&#039;s artistic carton design. Additionally, a decree for rendition of accounts was granted to determine the profits earned by the Defendants, with the Plaintiff entitled to costs and detailed compliance directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>