<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 608 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109760</link>
    <description>An official liquidator may obtain a decree for the claimed amount where the respondent, despite service, does not appear and the material averments remain uncontroverted. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC granted the application and passed a decree against the respondent, with pendente lite and future interest on the principal sum. The text also notes that the liquidator had sought to summon the respondent for examination on oath to fix liability under the Companies Act, 1956, but the uncontested claim was sufficient for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 608 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109760</link>
      <description>An official liquidator may obtain a decree for the claimed amount where the respondent, despite service, does not appear and the material averments remain uncontroverted. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC granted the application and passed a decree against the respondent, with pendente lite and future interest on the principal sum. The text also notes that the liquidator had sought to summon the respondent for examination on oath to fix liability under the Companies Act, 1956, but the uncontested claim was sufficient for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>