https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109753 Writ relief was found unavailable for disputed contractual recovery claims where the bank had an alternative statutory remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the auction challenge was inconsistent and had become infructuous, and the sugar company had already pursued a civil suit on the same dues. The factory was held bound by the Control Order to pay admitted cane price dues within time, and BIFR proceedings under section 22 of SICA did not bar recovery of those statutory dues. The recovery mechanism under the Control Order was upheld, and the farmers' statutory entitlement to payment was protected, subject to excise dues being cleared before release of the balance. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:49:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109753 Writ relief was found unavailable for disputed contractual recovery claims where the bank had an alternative statutory remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the auction challenge was inconsistent and had become infructuous, and the sugar company had already pursued a civil suit on the same dues. The factory was held bound by the Control Order to pay admitted cane price dues within time, and BIFR proceedings under section 22 of SICA did not bar recovery of those statutory dues. The recovery mechanism under the Control Order was upheld, and the farmers' statutory entitlement to payment was protected, subject to excise dues being cleared before release of the balance. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109753