https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109752 Where the authority fails to examine material evidence proving export and ignores relevant precedent on the acceptable proof for a notification claim, the appellate order is liable to be set aside. The matter was remanded because the lower authorities rejected the claim only for non-production of the original AR-4, without considering whether the Shipping Bill and other supporting documents could establish export or entitlement to credit or cash refund under the exemption scheme. en-us Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:58:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109752 Where the authority fails to examine material evidence proving export and ignores relevant precedent on the acceptable proof for a notification claim, the appellate order is liable to be set aside. The matter was remanded because the lower authorities rejected the claim only for non-production of the original AR-4, without considering whether the Shipping Bill and other supporting documents could establish export or entitlement to credit or cash refund under the exemption scheme. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109752