<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 566 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the 5% clearance limit for damaged or sub-standard textile fabrics and chindies should be separately applied as distinct categories under Notification 274/86. Appeal E/5442/91 was dismissed, while E/1078/92 was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 566 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the 5% clearance limit for damaged or sub-standard textile fabrics and chindies should be separately applied as distinct categories under Notification 274/86. Appeal E/5442/91 was dismissed, while E/1078/92 was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>