<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 574 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109719</link>
    <description>Modvat credit for parts used in manufacturing forklift trucks could not be denied merely because the parts were classified under Heading 8708.00. The decisive issue was actual use in or in relation to manufacture, and tariff classification alone was held insufficient to defeat credit where there was no proof that the goods were not so used. The unchallenged finding that actual use was not disproved supported rejection of the denial of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 574 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109719</link>
      <description>Modvat credit for parts used in manufacturing forklift trucks could not be denied merely because the parts were classified under Heading 8708.00. The decisive issue was actual use in or in relation to manufacture, and tariff classification alone was held insufficient to defeat credit where there was no proof that the goods were not so used. The unchallenged finding that actual use was not disproved supported rejection of the denial of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>