https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109716 The Tribunal granted the benefit of doubt to the appellants in a case involving allegations of clandestine production and removal of M.S. Steel Ingots. Despite suspicions raised, the evidence presented did not conclusively prove the charges. Emphasizing the principle that suspicion cannot substitute for proof, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order due to insufficient evidence establishing the charge of clandestine removal. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:08:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109716 The Tribunal granted the benefit of doubt to the appellants in a case involving allegations of clandestine production and removal of M.S. Steel Ingots. Despite suspicions raised, the evidence presented did not conclusively prove the charges. Emphasizing the principle that suspicion cannot substitute for proof, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order due to insufficient evidence establishing the charge of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109716