<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 594 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the ex-factory price should be the basis of valuation for goods sold through consignment agents. They excluded excess freight and insurance charges from the assessable value and found that the demand beyond the normal duration was time-barred due to no suppression of facts. As a result, the penalty imposition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 594 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the ex-factory price should be the basis of valuation for goods sold through consignment agents. They excluded excess freight and insurance charges from the assessable value and found that the demand beyond the normal duration was time-barred due to no suppression of facts. As a result, the penalty imposition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>