<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 387 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109692</link>
    <description>Sales tax paid later for disputed liabilities relating to an earlier period could not be deducted from the assessable value of goods cleared in the subsequent years under review. The decisive point was lack of nexus: the additional tax payment was attributable to prior-period clearances, not to the clearances made during 1985-86 and 1986-87. On that basis, the claimed deduction was disallowed and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 387 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109692</link>
      <description>Sales tax paid later for disputed liabilities relating to an earlier period could not be deducted from the assessable value of goods cleared in the subsequent years under review. The decisive point was lack of nexus: the additional tax payment was attributable to prior-period clearances, not to the clearances made during 1985-86 and 1986-87. On that basis, the claimed deduction was disallowed and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>