<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 412 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109678</link>
    <description>In a summons-case for a fine-only offence, where the summons permits appearance either in person or through a pleader, representation by an advocate can satisfy the requirement of appearance and personal attendance is not always necessary. The text also notes that bail conditions must remain reasonable: surety should be assessed on sufficiency in light of the facts, offence, and supporting material, rather than by rigid insistence on a Government servant surety or additional property documents. In the described matter, the offered sureties and supporting records were treated as adequate, and the stricter conditions were found unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 412 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109678</link>
      <description>In a summons-case for a fine-only offence, where the summons permits appearance either in person or through a pleader, representation by an advocate can satisfy the requirement of appearance and personal attendance is not always necessary. The text also notes that bail conditions must remain reasonable: surety should be assessed on sufficiency in light of the facts, offence, and supporting material, rather than by rigid insistence on a Government servant surety or additional property documents. In the described matter, the offered sureties and supporting records were treated as adequate, and the stricter conditions were found unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>