<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods for non-compliance with OGL-4 conditions, as spare parts were not supplied free of charge as claimed. The appellants were given a chance to produce a valid import license, potentially overturning the confiscation. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,75,000 to Rs. 90,000, and the personal penalty of Rs. 2,500 imposed on the appellants was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods for non-compliance with OGL-4 conditions, as spare parts were not supplied free of charge as claimed. The appellants were given a chance to produce a valid import license, potentially overturning the confiscation. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,75,000 to Rs. 90,000, and the personal penalty of Rs. 2,500 imposed on the appellants was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>