<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 575 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the goods supplied for installing lifts/escalators were correctly classified under Heading 84.31 as parts of lifts, not under Heading 84.28 as lifts/escalators. The Tribunal applied Interpretative Rule 1 and Rule 2(a) to determine that the goods did not meet the criteria for classification as lifts under Rule 2(a. The appellants&#039; request for a complete waiver of pre-deposit was denied, with the Tribunal directing a specified pre-deposit amount within a set timeframe, while indicating that the balance amount would be waived upon compliance, considering financial hardship and duty demand re-computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 575 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the goods supplied for installing lifts/escalators were correctly classified under Heading 84.31 as parts of lifts, not under Heading 84.28 as lifts/escalators. The Tribunal applied Interpretative Rule 1 and Rule 2(a) to determine that the goods did not meet the criteria for classification as lifts under Rule 2(a. The appellants&#039; request for a complete waiver of pre-deposit was denied, with the Tribunal directing a specified pre-deposit amount within a set timeframe, while indicating that the balance amount would be waived upon compliance, considering financial hardship and duty demand re-computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>