https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109643 Where a winding-up order has been stayed and no Official Liquidator has been appointed, leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prima facie not required to proceed against the company. In the matter described, permission was nevertheless sought because the writ court had directed the applicant to obtain leave from the Company Court, and the Company Court granted permission to prosecute the writ petition. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:46:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109643 Where a winding-up order has been stayed and no Official Liquidator has been appointed, leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prima facie not required to proceed against the company. In the matter described, permission was nevertheless sought because the writ court had directed the applicant to obtain leave from the Company Court, and the Company Court granted permission to prosecute the writ petition. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109643