<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 580 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109638</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Company Court&#039;s order dated 13-6-2003, considering all relevant facts, including the higher offer by the first respondent. It found the subsequent order by another judge justifiable due to the new situation created by the higher offer. The appeal challenging the Company Court&#039;s order was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 580 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109638</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Company Court&#039;s order dated 13-6-2003, considering all relevant facts, including the higher offer by the first respondent. It found the subsequent order by another judge justifiable due to the new situation created by the higher offer. The appeal challenging the Company Court&#039;s order was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>