<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 577 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109634</link>
    <description>A transparent sale process for company assets in liquidation, supported by expert valuation, public notice, and inter se negotiations before a sale committee, should not be reopened merely because a tenderer later offers a higher price. Where all tenderers were given a fair opportunity to improve bids and the best bid emerged through the committee process, a belated enhancement application is improper because it would unsettle the completed sale and turn the court into an auction forum. The late bid was rejected and the highest bid approved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 577 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109634</link>
      <description>A transparent sale process for company assets in liquidation, supported by expert valuation, public notice, and inter se negotiations before a sale committee, should not be reopened merely because a tenderer later offers a higher price. Where all tenderers were given a fair opportunity to improve bids and the best bid emerged through the committee process, a belated enhancement application is improper because it would unsettle the completed sale and turn the court into an auction forum. The late bid was rejected and the highest bid approved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>