<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 395 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109628</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the assessable value of yarn transferred to sister units for captive consumption. It was held that if the price under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act is ascertainable, there is no requirement to apply Section 4(1)(b) or valuation rules, citing precedent from previous tribunal decisions and the Supreme Court case of Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. CCE, Madras.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:18:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 395 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109628</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal on the assessable value of yarn transferred to sister units for captive consumption. It was held that if the price under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act is ascertainable, there is no requirement to apply Section 4(1)(b) or valuation rules, citing precedent from previous tribunal decisions and the Supreme Court case of Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. CCE, Madras.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>