<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 572 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109621</link>
    <description>The court admitted the winding-up petition, finding it maintainable as the petitioner complied with statutory notice requirements by sending notices to the registered office on record. The court dismissed the respondent&#039;s claim of a bona fide dispute, noting the respondent&#039;s acknowledgment of debt and lack of diligent pursuit of counterclaims. Consequently, the court directed the publication of the citation and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator to take control of the respondent company&#039;s assets and records. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 16th October 2003, with observations deemed prima facie.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 572 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109621</link>
      <description>The court admitted the winding-up petition, finding it maintainable as the petitioner complied with statutory notice requirements by sending notices to the registered office on record. The court dismissed the respondent&#039;s claim of a bona fide dispute, noting the respondent&#039;s acknowledgment of debt and lack of diligent pursuit of counterclaims. Consequently, the court directed the publication of the citation and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator to take control of the respondent company&#039;s assets and records. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 16th October 2003, with observations deemed prima facie.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>