<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109614</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Mumbai held that an adjudication order could not stand where the assessee had sought deferment of the show cause notice because the duty dispute on shrinkage of grey fabrics was pending before the Supreme Court, and that request was not effectively considered. The record showed no proper opportunity of hearing before the order was passed, amounting to breach of natural justice. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 567 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109614</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Mumbai held that an adjudication order could not stand where the assessee had sought deferment of the show cause notice because the duty dispute on shrinkage of grey fabrics was pending before the Supreme Court, and that request was not effectively considered. The record showed no proper opportunity of hearing before the order was passed, amounting to breach of natural justice. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>