https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109611 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of appeals due to non-compliance with the stay order terms in 1996. Despite efforts to restore the appeal through writ petitions and subsequent applications, the appellants failed to pre-deposit the entire duty and penalty amounts as directed, leading to rejection of their appeals. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to its earlier ruling in a similar case, requiring full pre-deposit for restoration. The appellants' arguments of unavoidable delays were not accepted, and the appeals could not be restored without full compliance, in line with established precedents. en-us Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:24:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109611 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of appeals due to non-compliance with the stay order terms in 1996. Despite efforts to restore the appeal through writ petitions and subsequent applications, the appellants failed to pre-deposit the entire duty and penalty amounts as directed, leading to rejection of their appeals. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to its earlier ruling in a similar case, requiring full pre-deposit for restoration. The appellants' arguments of unavoidable delays were not accepted, and the appeals could not be restored without full compliance, in line with established precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109611