<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 424 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109597</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition against the respondent company as the petitioner failed to provide evidence of sending the statutory notice under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, by registered post AD. Without proof of serving the notice, the petition lacked a fundamental basis for consideration, leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 424 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109597</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition against the respondent company as the petitioner failed to provide evidence of sending the statutory notice under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, by registered post AD. Without proof of serving the notice, the petition lacked a fundamental basis for consideration, leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>