https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109572 Premature publication of a winding-up petition before any direction of the Company Court was treated as an advertisement of the petition and a serious abuse of process. Rule 96 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 contemplates filing, admission, hearing, and only then advertisement directions, while Rule 24 permits advertisement only where required by the rules or ordered by the Judge. The Court held that such abuse justified refusal to entertain the petition at the threshold, and a full hearing on merits was not required where the preliminary objection disclosed misuse of the process. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:59:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109572 Premature publication of a winding-up petition before any direction of the Company Court was treated as an advertisement of the petition and a serious abuse of process. Rule 96 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 contemplates filing, admission, hearing, and only then advertisement directions, while Rule 24 permits advertisement only where required by the rules or ordered by the Judge. The Court held that such abuse justified refusal to entertain the petition at the threshold, and a full hearing on merits was not required where the preliminary objection disclosed misuse of the process. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109572