<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 466 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109569</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the court, upholding the order that the settlement between the company and the petitioning creditor was in the best interest of the company, thus no winding-up order was made. The court found no merit in the appellants&#039; arguments, emphasizing the importance of preserving the company and exercising discretion in winding-up proceedings. All interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 466 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109569</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the court, upholding the order that the settlement between the company and the petitioning creditor was in the best interest of the company, thus no winding-up order was made. The court found no merit in the appellants&#039; arguments, emphasizing the importance of preserving the company and exercising discretion in winding-up proceedings. All interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>