<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 391 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109562</link>
    <description>Confiscation of a vehicle used to transport smuggled goods under the Customs Act cannot be sustained without evidence that the driver or owner knew of, or was involved in, the contraband character of the cargo. Where the record did not establish the driver&#039;s knowledge of the smuggled nature of the bundles and there was no proof of the owner&#039;s direct participation, the vehicle confiscation was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 391 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109562</link>
      <description>Confiscation of a vehicle used to transport smuggled goods under the Customs Act cannot be sustained without evidence that the driver or owner knew of, or was involved in, the contraband character of the cargo. Where the record did not establish the driver&#039;s knowledge of the smuggled nature of the bundles and there was no proof of the owner&#039;s direct participation, the vehicle confiscation was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>